Home > Articles > Legislative News from the...
Printable Version
Tell a friend
Legislative News from the Senate Minority Leader...
Monday, February 5, 2007
Senator Clint Stennett
District
25
Legislative
Week #4
February 2, 2007
This week The Fair Elections
Act (Senate Bill 1037), of
which I was a co-sponsor, had a hearing in the
Senate State Affairs
committee. It failed on a party line
vote of 2-7. This bill would
have been revolutionary for politics. It
would have implemented a
voluntary public campaign financing
system for Idaho. In this
system, candidates could volunteer to utilize
this public source of funding for
a statewide or legislative campaign after they
collected 150 individual $5
dollar donations. Candidates would then
receive an adequate amount to run
a campaign, but would not be able to take any
private contributions from
political action committees. Further,
any money the candidate would
collect from individual public donors would
then be placed into the general
campaign fund.
Opponents to the bill argued that Idaho's current campaign finance system, which permits private contributions, is not inherently corrupt and works just fine. They insisted that their votes are not for sale, regardless of how much money an organization or person contributes to their campaign. As one who runs campaigns by this current system, I agree with that. Idaho has elected many honorable public officials who make great strides to vote in the best interest of their constituency. However, in the wake of the national political scandals, the public is rapidly losing confidence in all its elected officials, and consequently elected officials are becoming more distant from their constituency. With members of the US Congress engaged in raising campaign money on full-time basis, they are increasingly becoming beholden to the special interests that fund their campaigns. As laboratories for change, individual states are in a unique position to restore faith in our government. Implementing this system in Idaho would drastically change the way we do business and would provide our Federal Congress with a model.
Opponents to the bill argued that Idaho's current campaign finance system, which permits private contributions, is not inherently corrupt and works just fine. They insisted that their votes are not for sale, regardless of how much money an organization or person contributes to their campaign. As one who runs campaigns by this current system, I agree with that. Idaho has elected many honorable public officials who make great strides to vote in the best interest of their constituency. However, in the wake of the national political scandals, the public is rapidly losing confidence in all its elected officials, and consequently elected officials are becoming more distant from their constituency. With members of the US Congress engaged in raising campaign money on full-time basis, they are increasingly becoming beholden to the special interests that fund their campaigns. As laboratories for change, individual states are in a unique position to restore faith in our government. Implementing this system in Idaho would drastically change the way we do business and would provide our Federal Congress with a model.
The intention behind Senate Bill 1037 was
not to indicate that we have a
corrupt system in Idaho; the idea was
that there is a better system
available. One benefit of this system is that
public financing returns more time
to candidates to personally reach out to
voters and encourages a more direct
dialogue between elected officials and voters.
It enhances the candidate pool,
especially for new candidates who may need the
extra support and encouragement
to run. And last but not least, this
system feeds the "market place of
ideas" by giving candidates the tools to get
their messages out.
Naturally many people ask how this system
is funded. In addition to
voluntary contributions from the public,
Senate Bill 1037 supplemented this
program by an additional 10% surcharge on
civil penalties. This would give the
fund roughly $ 4-7 million annually. It would
not be funded by tax
dollars. With the element of public
funding, some have labeled similar
legislation, "welfare for politicians."
I argue that many of our public
institutions and services are funded by public
dollars: roads, public safety,
schools, research grants etc. This
system would permit the public to own
the campaign process by protecting our
republic from being taken over by special
interests.
This system is relatively new, but it is working well in other states. Ten states have this type of financing for various elected positions, but Arizona and Maine have this funding available for all their statewide and legislative candidates. A decade has passed since the introduction of this funding in Maine and over eighty percent of their candidates use this system. After only five years, forty-three percent of Arizona's candidates chose to use this system of funding. It is used equally by both Republican and Democratic parties and sometimes third parties have utilized this funding too.
Public campaign financing in these states is not perfect, and the states are challenged to iron out those flaws. Yet this system is ensuring clean money, protecting clean elections and restoring more confidence in our leaders than any other existing campaign finance system. This system supports our core democratic values of a responsive and a responsible government. I will continue to pursue this for Idaho.
As always, I welcome any suggestions, or comments you have to offer. It is my honor to serve District 25. I can be reached by calling (208) 332-1000 or toll-free 1-800-626-0471, via email at stennett@senate.idaho.gov, or by mail to P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID 83720.
This system is relatively new, but it is working well in other states. Ten states have this type of financing for various elected positions, but Arizona and Maine have this funding available for all their statewide and legislative candidates. A decade has passed since the introduction of this funding in Maine and over eighty percent of their candidates use this system. After only five years, forty-three percent of Arizona's candidates chose to use this system of funding. It is used equally by both Republican and Democratic parties and sometimes third parties have utilized this funding too.
Public campaign financing in these states is not perfect, and the states are challenged to iron out those flaws. Yet this system is ensuring clean money, protecting clean elections and restoring more confidence in our leaders than any other existing campaign finance system. This system supports our core democratic values of a responsive and a responsible government. I will continue to pursue this for Idaho.
As always, I welcome any suggestions, or comments you have to offer. It is my honor to serve District 25. I can be reached by calling (208) 332-1000 or toll-free 1-800-626-0471, via email at stennett@senate.idaho.gov, or by mail to P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID 83720.
