Home > Articles > Senator Stennett's...
Printable Version
Tell a friend
Senator Stennett's Legislative weekly column--Week 6
Monday, February 19, 2007
Legislative News from the Senate
Minority
Leader...
Senator Clint Stennett
District 25
Legislative Week #6
February 16th, 2007
I can still recall the late October day
when I harvested my last bull elk.
After four full days of glassing and stalking,
we could not quite put it all
together. On the morning of the last day of
the season, my wife and I had hiked
1500 feet up the mountain. It was 8am and we
were in a foot of new snow.
We had lost first light, but before we called
it off I suggested that we look
over the next ridge. We belly crawled to the
ridge line and at 245 yards, we
found a six point bull. I have harvested
a half a dozen elk in 38 years
of hunting. Each one is burned in my
memory as the one I just described.
It is this type of fair chase hunting on
public lands that many Idahoans dream
about and hope for as they head into the back
country each Fall for their annual
hunt. This type of hunting is our heritage,
our ethic and our
culture.
New in Idaho, today one can go to an elk farm, pay thousands of dollars to walk into a fenced area and shoot the bull of their choice. Within hours a person can jet into Idaho, kill a prized bull-elk, get back on the plane and be home for supper. The rack from my most prized bull, which I hunted a lifetime for on public lands, would pale in comparison to some of the grain-fed monsters bred for their big antlers at these “shooter bull”operations. This isn’t the heritage or sport we all associate with real hunting. This is a guaranteed and glorified kill. It is nothing more than over-priced target practice for out-of-state fat cats who want the grand prize of a hunt without a fair chase of one. This isn’t Idaho.
This week in Senate Agriculture Affairs Committee we considered Senate Bill 1073, which would have outlawed these canned-hunt operations. This bill failed to pass committee. Opponents of the bill argued that this was not an issue of fair-chase hunting. They said it was an issue of personal property rights, and if someone wants to charge people to kill elk on their land they should have that right.
Yet if we don’t protect our heritage, and our traditions of fair-chase hunting on public lands, it won’t be long before we become like Europe. In Europe the tradition of public hunting for all has become a story of the past. Today, only the rich are able to pursue game on private land reserves. Hunting should not be about who has the biggest wallet. Yet, Europeans cannot pay any price for the rush of a fair-chase; that opportunity is gone. They will never know the thrill of winning the draw for a tag, hiking for miles in public lands, enduring the cold weather and elements, long days of scouting, and the final silence before the squeeze of the trigger. If we don’t protect this heritage, our future generations will not know this either.
Along with the shooter bull operations that permit the killing of elk within their fences, there are other ranches (aka cervidae farms) that just raise elk like cattle for their meat. This week, we also considered other legislation that would affect all these type of elk farms. When elk are penned up, the risk of contracting diseases, such as chronic wasting disease (CWD), brucellosis, tuberculosis, or giant liver fluke, increases dramatically. When farm-raised elk escape into the wild, our wild herd is then threatened with these diseases as well. Last year after the escape of elk from a ranch in Eastern Idaho, more Idahoans and legislators began taking a closer look at the dangers of the relatively new industry.
New in Idaho, today one can go to an elk farm, pay thousands of dollars to walk into a fenced area and shoot the bull of their choice. Within hours a person can jet into Idaho, kill a prized bull-elk, get back on the plane and be home for supper. The rack from my most prized bull, which I hunted a lifetime for on public lands, would pale in comparison to some of the grain-fed monsters bred for their big antlers at these “shooter bull”operations. This isn’t the heritage or sport we all associate with real hunting. This is a guaranteed and glorified kill. It is nothing more than over-priced target practice for out-of-state fat cats who want the grand prize of a hunt without a fair chase of one. This isn’t Idaho.
This week in Senate Agriculture Affairs Committee we considered Senate Bill 1073, which would have outlawed these canned-hunt operations. This bill failed to pass committee. Opponents of the bill argued that this was not an issue of fair-chase hunting. They said it was an issue of personal property rights, and if someone wants to charge people to kill elk on their land they should have that right.
Yet if we don’t protect our heritage, and our traditions of fair-chase hunting on public lands, it won’t be long before we become like Europe. In Europe the tradition of public hunting for all has become a story of the past. Today, only the rich are able to pursue game on private land reserves. Hunting should not be about who has the biggest wallet. Yet, Europeans cannot pay any price for the rush of a fair-chase; that opportunity is gone. They will never know the thrill of winning the draw for a tag, hiking for miles in public lands, enduring the cold weather and elements, long days of scouting, and the final silence before the squeeze of the trigger. If we don’t protect this heritage, our future generations will not know this either.
Along with the shooter bull operations that permit the killing of elk within their fences, there are other ranches (aka cervidae farms) that just raise elk like cattle for their meat. This week, we also considered other legislation that would affect all these type of elk farms. When elk are penned up, the risk of contracting diseases, such as chronic wasting disease (CWD), brucellosis, tuberculosis, or giant liver fluke, increases dramatically. When farm-raised elk escape into the wild, our wild herd is then threatened with these diseases as well. Last year after the escape of elk from a ranch in Eastern Idaho, more Idahoans and legislators began taking a closer look at the dangers of the relatively new industry.
This week we passed legislation out of
committee ( S1074) that would
require these operations to be licensed to
operate in Idaho. The
legislation would increase the penalties if
operations do not comply with the
rules and regulations. Yet this
legislation has a year delay and leaves
most of the regulation to be decided in the
rules process to be determined by
the Idaho Department of Agriculture. While I
voted in favor of the bill in
committee, I would have preferred this
legislation to have more teeth and real
regulations written into Idaho Code.
Other bills we considered this week ,
such as Senate Bill 1072, would
have created some real regulation. That bill
would have required these
operations to have double fences to prevent
escape of farm-raised elk, and nose
to nose contact with wild elk. This bill
failed the committee by a 3-6
vote. Also failing committee by a
3-6 vote was a 5 year moratorium
on more cervidae farms or ranches in
Idaho(Senate Bill 1004). If we permit
this industry to grow without stricter
regulations, we are risking the health of
the wild herds. A moratorium would have given
us adequate time to ensure that we
develop a protective barrier between the
domestic cervidae ranches and the wild
herds the rest of us enjoy.
In a nutshell on the topic of elk farms
and shooter bull operations, this
week in the Senate Agriculture Committee we
did nothing more than pass a
requirement that these operations need to be
licensed. We have not made
any significant progress in strengthening the
regulations that protect our wild
herd from farm raised elk or guarantee our
hunting heritage and traditions. When
a similar lack of legislative action occurred
in Montana, citizens introduced an
initiative to ban these farms completely. In
Idaho, we had an opportunity to
offer protections to both the industry and our
heritage. Unfortunately
this week the legislature has done nothing to
protect our hunting
traditions. It is possible that an
initiative similar to Montana’s will be
introduced here in Idaho. A citizen’s
initiative will likely be more
restrictive than the legislative approach we
could have offered this
session.
As always, I welcome any suggestions, or comments you have to offer. It is my honor to serve District 25. I can be reached by calling (208) 332-1000 or toll-free 1-800-626-0471, via email at stennett@senate.idaho.gov, or by mail to P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID 83720.
